Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 10,191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2013, 7:09 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm
First, it is important to note for laypersons that law gets made in the United States in one of two ways, either by statutes and regulations created by legislatures, or by case law from courts of appeal deciding certain issues on appeal from the trial court. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 10:11 am
Let’s be clear: Any member of Congress who votes to give state and local police the power to do immigration enforcement is voting to open the door to widespread racial profiling and illegal detentions throughout the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
In the case, United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:07 am
The Senate Report accompanying the original bill confirmed this meaning: `The definition explicitly includes any officer or employee of the United States or any State or political subdivision of a State. . . . [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 12:08 pm
This is my second post today on Wednesday's filings in the Microsoft v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:23 pm
Supreme Court, in its divided 5-4 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:55 pm
How fitting for Michigan to take this major first step in aligning its practices with the requirements of the United States Constitution during this 50th anniversary year of the Gideon v Wainwright decision, which guaranteed counsel to indigent defendants facing prison time. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
Further, the Court decided McQuiggin v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:52 am
The case of US v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
United States, a case regarding damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled this Wednesday that section 3 of DOMA violates the Constitution. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:05 am
First articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am
With this decision, accompanied by the defeat of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
“Today’s Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:19 am
This week's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:12 pm
The case that made it to the Supreme Court which ultimately led to its overturning is United States v. [read post]
