Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 6161 - 6180 of 15,571
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Flat fee v. pay per performance v. tournament—if you do very well, big payment, but otherwise nothing. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
The Secretariat of the Norwegian Pension Fund Global has just circulated the decision, taken in April 2016 by the Norwegian Ethics Council, to recommend exclusion of Duke Energy Corp. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:24 am by Verena von Bomhard
Therefore, a reimbursement so low that it is disproportionate and even insignificant was held to deprive Article 14 of its practical effect. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:07 am by Kevin Cloutier and Mikela Sutrina
This legislative action, of course, follows the significant Illinois court decision in Fifield v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:21 am by Eliana Baer
Judge Jones of Ocean County recently addressed what happens when one spouse requests support of the other during the divorce proceedings, or on a pendente lite basis, under the newly enacted statutory amendments to New Jersey’s alimony statute in the recent case of Malik v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 7:08 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
A low sodium, low fat, low sugar diet doesn’t typically result in a tax deduction. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:39 am
The IPKat posted a report earlier this week of the case Hospira v Cubist, in which three patents belonging to Cubist were revoked by Mr Justice Carr. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:23 pm by John M. O'Connor
  On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case also says for the first time that "Cat's Paw" liability can apply when the antagonist is a co-worker and not just a supervisor.The case is Vasquez v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 5:35 am by John M. O'Connor
  On August 29, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in Vasquez v. [read post]