Search for: "State v. F. T." Results 6161 - 6180 of 18,410
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2011, 12:31 am
Thus, "objective baselessness" depends not on the state of mind of the party against whom fees are sought, see Seagate, 497 F.3d at 1371, but instead on "an objective assessment of the merits" of the challenged claims and defenses. iLOR, 2011 U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
That acknowledgment, as the cases discussed above show, doesn't preclude liability. [1] Ringler Associates Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
(P & F) 567(see LexisOne, or e.g Supreme Court of the United States (.pdf))Scott Dodson at the Virginia Law Review writes in Pleading Standards After Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 1:38 am
" Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1315 (quoting Multiform Desiccants, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:20 am by Bexis
Aesthetech Corp., 341 F.3d 911, 919 (9th Cir. 2003) (applying Washington law); Gebhardt v. [read post]