Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 6161 - 6180
of 9,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2013, 4:54 pm
The lifting of the ban places the United States with roughly a dozen other countries that allow women to serve as part of combat units, including Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, New Zealand, and Norway. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 2:26 pm
” United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm
The Act requires that more than three quarters of advanced biofuel sold in the United States after January 1, 2022 be cellulosic biofuel. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:05 am
Jackson filed her brief in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:52 am
Georgia, 219 Ga. 345, 133 S.E. 2d 367 (Ga. 1963); State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:02 pm
In 2005, he came to the attention of “United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement” agents who were investigating a child pornography website. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
The judge in assuming that there was such evidence effectively reversed the burden of proof. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:20 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that UPS did not have to afford a pregnant employee an accommodation relative to an essential job function. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
(Arlington says this is the same question the Court always asks at “Step Zero” of its Chevron inquiry, pursuant to the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:52 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 2:44 pm
Plaintiffs submits in support of her Motion the case of Killingsworth v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
However, the Appellate Division also considered the president’s claim that that the disciplinary proceeding commenced against him, and the discipline ultimately imposed, violated his right to free speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, explaining that courts “must balance free-speech principles against the threat to effective government operation presented by that speech. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 3:54 pm
When so many thoughtful people, including former prosecutors, disagree with United States Attorney's conduct in these cases, we need to stop. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:36 am
United States, --- S.Ct. ----, 2013 WL 85299 (U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
United States and Pleau v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:15 am
Alvarez: Trademark Dilution and the First AmendmentEarlier this week, the United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion on the Stolen Valor Act (18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
