Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 601 - 620
of 11,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2007, 10:01 am
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967) (authorizing counsel to request permission to withdraw after counsel conscientiously examines case and determines that appeal would be wholly frivolous), where government moves to enforce appeal waiver provisions of plea agreement, and appellant's counsel submits statement that there are no meritorious grounds to oppose government's motion, appellant must be allowed opportunity to submit pro se response because appellate… [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:41 am
For claimants and their attorneys, Witt is a reminder to be diligent and closely examine the insurer’s actions and motivations for an extension. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 12:01 pm
First off, any lawyer handling a criminal appeal needs to keep up on legal developments, as we do in trying to regularly read the opinions from the Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court and other relevant sources. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:34 am
Claimant said she had difficulty reading, but also that she could read the newspaper and understand what she was reading. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 7:12 am
This was rejected by the Examining Division in view of amended Rules 27 and 28 EPC. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm
Nov. 21, 2023), the Court of Appeals held the prosecutor’s cross-examination of the defendant about statements he made in open court “was an inappropriate form of impeachment. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:01 pm
The present decision deals with an appeal against the decision of the Examining Division to refuse the patent. [read post]
15 May 2021, 4:51 pm
The outcome: Uniloc 2017 LLC appeals from a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review of Uniloc’s U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:40 pm
An IU employee came and examined the window. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:01 pm
The present appeal deals with the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED) based on the finding that the claims on file did not comply with A 123(2). [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 4:19 am
Jacobs of the federal appeals court in New York. [read post]
15 May 2011, 3:01 pm
The outcome of the present appeal is likely not to please some of the Examiners among the readers of this blog. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:50 am
After you read this decision ask yourself the question: Would You Have Appealed? [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 12:56 pm
Even if the examiner is not persuaded, the arguments may be persuasive on appeal. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 12:56 pm
Even if the examiner is not persuaded, the arguments may be persuasive on appeal. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm
Hence, the appeal is not allowable. [2.4] To read the whole decision, click here. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:47 am
" A representative claim on appeal read: 1. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:24 am
And the Michigan Court of Appeals recently ruled that any patient-to-patient sales of ma are illegal. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:35 pm
The examiner still stands by the rejection decision. [read post]
