Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2017, 12:09 pm
In Olympus Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
Veazie, 8 How. 251, 255–256 (1850); United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the State of California v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the State of California v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
It furthermore held that the authorities of the committees relied upon by the appellants was “slight” as a matter of international law, relying on Jones v Ministry of Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [2007] 1 AC 270 at [23]. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
Dicta in Regina v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:35 am
ACE filed a motion for summary judgment stating they had no duty to defend Gavion because Gavion never asked for help. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
To cut to the chase (and omit the first hundred or so paragraphs), following Lord Kerr in A v Essex County Council (National Autistic Society intervening) [2011] AC 280; [2010] UKSC 33 the High Court found that a failure to take steps to provide education when the state authority responsible for providing it is aware of the absence of the pupil from any form of education could in certain circumstances give rise to a breach of the right. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
Only a higher court can say now whether there is more to s.98(4)(b) than Lord Simon of Glaisdale felt able to see in it in Devis v Atkins[1977] AC 931, which was a wide construction of “reasonably” (a formula which, with great respect, could be used to justify a band of possible decisions broad enough to encompass what a tribunal views as substantively inequitable and unmeritorious dismissals). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am
” At ACS Blog, Brandon Garrett weighs in on the court’s ruling last week in McWilliams v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:42 am
Commentary comes from Ira Lupu and Bob Tuttle at ACS blog, David Cortman in an op-ed for the St. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Determining if a complaint alleging sexual harassment based a claim of a continuing violation of New York State's Human Rights Law is timelyLozada v Elmont Hook & Ladder Co. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 9:36 am
Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd and Jacqueline Lewis) v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:53 am
Anyone can challenge a patent in court proceedings, so the act of state doctrine was not an impediment, even if validity were in issue. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
A three-judge panel agreed in Mandel v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
I would agree with Mr Westgate that, since the creation of a statutory right of appeal to the county court, recourse to the highly restrictive approach adopted 30 years ago in the Puhlhofer case (R v Hillingdon London Borough Council, Ex p Puhlhofer [1986] AC 484) is no longer necessary or appropriate. [read post]
