Search for: "Amendments To Rules Regulating the Bar"
Results 601 - 620
of 4,987
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2023, 4:10 pm
In Blinkoff’s most recent action, she filed suit against the City, the Planning & Zoning Commission, and four individuals, bringing two claims: fraud on the court pursuant to Rule 60(d)(3) of Civil Procedure and a Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
The other five members consist of two members of the Israeli Bar Association and, remarkably, three members of the Court itself: the Chief Justice and two other Supreme Court justices. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
But most all rules we have ever seen—especially in public address settings—do not go that far; they simply prevent “disruption” the way Stanford Law School’s own rules apparently do. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:32 am
She also noted that the First Amendment bars regulating speech “on the ground that listeners might find its content disturbing. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
Each was marked by amendments to perti [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 8:50 am
First Amendment. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm
Kurt Lash on Baby Ninth Amendments? [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 8:12 am
On March 23, the FTC proposed a “click to cancel” amendment to its Negative Option Rule. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 6:24 am
They relied on Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, the federal law barring sex discrimination at schools that receive federal funding. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:10 am
According to "Google Statistics", New York Public Personnel Law [NYPPL] readers are frequently accessing summaries court decisions and administrative rulings addressing health insurance issues involving active officers and employees of the State as the employer, officers and employees of political subdivisions of the State as the employer and retirees of the State and political subdivisions of the State posted on NYPPL. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:10 am
According to "Google Statistics", New York Public Personnel Law [NYPPL] readers are frequently accessing summaries court decisions and administrative rulings addressing health insurance issues involving active officers and employees of the State as the employer, officers and employees of political subdivisions of the State as the employer and retirees of the State and political subdivisions of the State posted on NYPPL. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Trump’s team could still appeal the ruling, but they have lost similar cases previously. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:55 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) originally filed the lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas in 2018 pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 7:22 am
House of Lords ruled that former Chilian President Augusto Pinochet was not immune from prosecution for the international crime of torture. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:04 am
On March 22, 2023, the Department of Defense (DoD) issued a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to allow a procuring contracting officer (PCO) to delegate the authority to the contract administration office (CAO) to negotiate and settle direct costs questioned in an indirect cost rate proposal audit. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 11:36 am
In addition, unauthorized trading can also violate securities industry regulations and rules. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
(It is unclear why no one seems to have proposed a motion to amend Draft Article 7 by adding the crime of aggression before proceeding to vote on the adoption of the article.) [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
But after Congress amended that legislation to remedy its constitutional weaknesses, the FTC finalized the rule. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 9:04 pm
And getting out of trouble meant maneuvering through layers of rules and regulations that a safety-conscious Minnesota had long imposed. [read post]
Can fishermen be required to pay for federal monitors? And by the way – should Chevron be overruled?
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am
Watts should be overruled; and (3) whether, in avoidance of the constitutional question, the rules of issue preclusion, as applied in federal criminal cases, bar imposition of an aggravated sentence on a factual predicate necessarily rejected by the jury at trial in the same case. [read post]
