Search for: "Bull v. Bull" Results 601 - 620 of 3,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2020, 9:02 am by Léon Dijkman
The analysis is based on a set of concrete tests of SEPs in order to: (i) identify best practices on performing essentiality checks; (ii) find out the best cost-effective manner; (iii) consider policy and legal implications for a scrutiny mechanism for SEPs; (iv) identify possible benefits and incentives for the players to pass such a scrutiny. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
81 percent of agencies said the most common use of social media was for criminal investigations; 80 percent of agencies reported that social media helped solve the crimes in their investigations; 69 percent of agencies surveyed had social media policies and 14 percent were in the process of crafting policies; 92 percent of the investigations were conducted… [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 1:29 pm by Jeffrey May
This most recent case is U.S. v. eBay, Inc., Case No. 12-58690. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 2:49 pm by Zachary Spilman
Last week’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:58 pm by Zachary Spilman
Judge Stucky, writing for a unanimous court in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:29 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in the case of Bull v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 6:34 am by Just Security
Israel-Hamas War Israel’s Rewriting of the Law of War by Leonard Rubenstein (@lenrubenstein) In Defense of Gaza’s Hospitals and Health Workers by Elise Baker (@elise_baker) Senator Sanders’ New Resolution Could Force U.S. to Confront Any Complicity in Civilian Harm by John Ramming Chappell (@jwrchappell) and Hassan El-Tayyab (@HassanElTayyab) U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:40 am by drdiekman
The case is Orozco v. 725 S. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 6:27 am by Zachary Spilman
Case links: N-MCCA opinion Appellant’s brief Appellee’s (government) brief Blog post: Argument preview Followed by: United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:07 am by PaulKostro
Super. 324, 339 (App.Div. 1981) (quoting Aiello v. [read post]