Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
Michael, Attorney General; John G. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 12:24 pm
” However, recently the Court of Appeals decided in In re Matter of Burton (Case No. 313448) in an unpublished decision that a mother’s parental rights were properly terminated because she exposed the children to the father’s domestic violence and the criminal activities. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
Correction is then effected by way of a corrigendum or reprint of the entire specification, see EPC Guidelines C-V 10 (September 2013), last paragraph. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 6:01 am
990 Revenue Less Expenses 2017 2018 School A -$1,740,899 -$331,894 School B -$2,361,093 -$2,719,319 School C $2,099,592 -$264,383 School D $1,179,037 $4,668,804 School E -$1,340,958 -$3,453,295 School F $945,640 $29,612,793 School G -$3,270,424 -$1,111,501 School H -$2,510,861 -$8,155,296 School I $59,515,319 -$3,918,838 School J -$20,456,417 $7,985,200 School K -$1,649,617 -$1,661,162 School L … [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Addressing another aspect of Petitioners' FOIL request, the Appellate Division observed that Petitioners had also sought FDNY "... records[] pertaining to cases initiated by the Bureau of Investigations and Trials ('BIT[S]')" . . . , including . . . details of all BIT[S] cases initiated against members of the FDNY, with a breakdown of each case identified by: [c]ase number; [b]ureau . . . ; [i]nfractions charged; [r]ace of charged party;… [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Addressing another aspect of Petitioners' FOIL request, the Appellate Division observed that Petitioners had also sought FDNY "... records[] pertaining to cases initiated by the Bureau of Investigations and Trials ('BIT[S]')" . . . , including . . . details of all BIT[S] cases initiated against members of the FDNY, with a breakdown of each case identified by: [c]ase number; [b]ureau . . . ; [i]nfractions charged; [r]ace of charged party;… [read post]
10 May 2020, 2:32 am
It is sufficient to recall that, only a few days ago, in its important judgment in Gömböc, C-237/19 [IPKats posts here and here], the CJEU held that each IP right has its own subsistence requirements and the analysis required to determine protection under one right is different from that mandated under other rights. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:32 am
Kunz of Hathaway & Kunz, PC, Cheyenne, Wyoming; John C. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:44 pm
McQuade was joined in the announcement by Andrew G. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:44 pm
McQuade was joined in the announcement by Andrew G. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:00 pm
Thirteen years after Michel G. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 2:44 pm
Petersburg and Clearwater family law sections, except as provided herein, all post judgment matters and temporary support matters are automatically referred to mediation. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:10 pm
Not too long before Bill C-75, the federal government passed Bill C-46, coming into effect in December 2018. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
By Steven G. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:36 pm
Disclosure in general is governed by G.S. 132-1.4A(c), (d), and (e). [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 2:31 pm
Section 103(c)(1) (pre-AIA) provides that “[s]ubject matter developed by another person, which qualifies as prior art only under one or more subsections (e), (f), and (g) of section 102, shall not preclude patentability under this section where the subject matter and the claimed invention were, at the time the claimed invention was made, owned by the same person or subject to an obligation of assignment to the same person. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:42 am
Relying inter alia on T 990/96, the Examining Division argued that the disclosure of amorphous Lercanidipine Hydrochloride ("LH") and its manufacture in prior art document D1 already had made available this compound to the public in the sense of Article 54 EPC in all desired grades of purity, and the claimed degree of purity could therefore not render the claims novel.Departing from T 990/96 and subsequent cases including T 0728/98, the present… [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
See also John G. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
In decision T 604/01, the board held that objections under A 123(2) and (3) which the opponent raised during the opposition proceedings but did not further explain until OPs could not be excluded under R 71a(1) EPC 1973 because these objections were a matter of argument. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:03 pm
Furthermore, 11 NYCRR 65-3.5(c) entitles an insurer to receive all items necessary to verify a claim directly from the parties from whom such verification was requested. [read post]
