Search for: "C. Henderson"
Results 601 - 620
of 730
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am
It was trite law that there was no basis for distinguishing between the costs of an in-house lawyer and an external one: Henderson v Merthyr Tydfil UDC [1900] 1 QB 434, as applied over the subsequent century. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:13 am
The following is a guest post from Ryan Goodman, continuing a conversation begun yesterday in this post from Geoff Corn, Laurie Blank, Chris Jenks, and Eric Jensen. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 8:27 pm
Henderson Development (Canada) Ltd. and Securiguard Services Ltd. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 6:46 pm
Willie Jasper Darden, 54, executed March 15, 1988, for the September 1973 shooting of James C. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:12 am
Proctor Hospital, and Henderson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Bush appointee Judge Karen Henderson – put a temporary stay on Howell’s ruling. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm
[UPDATE 04/02/2011: Over at StandFirm, commenter "Doubting Thomas" challenges the accuracy of the above account, having learned from his "source" at the HoB meeting that the presentation to the assembled bishops included the concerns of Bishop Lawrence and his counsel, C. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 12:52 am
The latter claim in unison that the adoption of Title IV was not in accord with ECUSA's Constitution; but the former demonstrated by their votes at GC 2009 that they already disagreed with him -- even before the charges against him were brought to their attention.In fact, this entire procedure under the "Abandonment Canon" points up just what is the abuse of that Canon by ECUSA's current leadership -- including, it must now be said, Bishop Dorsey Henderson. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:15 am
• C. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
’ ” Henderson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
C. [read post]
Latest Proposed CEQA Legislation (SB 122) Seeks To Reform Administrative Record Process – At A Price
22 Jan 2015, 4:43 pm
Coon and Matthew C. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:16 pm
Draine, Astrophysics, Princeton UniversityJay Driskell,History, Hood CollegeMichael C. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
Rose Dominican Hospital in Henderson, Nevada. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 1:54 pm
What a whirlwind of a year it has been for legal technology. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the requesting… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the requesting… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the requesting… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the requesting… [read post]
