Search for: "Call v. Superior Court" Results 601 - 620 of 4,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2021, 8:05 am by Dan Bressler
” “The Superior Court majority said the late-erected barrier wasn’t enough in the Darrow case, weighing disqualification based on factors that the Eastern District of Pennsylvania established in its 1995 decision in Dworkin v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
“I was called Monsieur le juge for years…” (p. 177) Backhouse describes the similar experience of Justice Mabel Van Camp, the first woman appointed to Ontario’s Superior Court in 1971, who objected to the customary title ‘Mister Justice. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 2:33 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
In a pair of recent decisions, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered how other particular factors influence the amount of “reasonable” notice of termination. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 2:33 pm by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
In a pair of recent decisions, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered how other particular factors influence the amount of “reasonable” notice of termination. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Jordan Bierkos
Introduction I often explain the difference between (non-lienable) maintenance and repair work on the one hand and (lienable) construction work on the other, by using the analogy of the landscaper who may be called to a worksite and, in one scenario, asked to mow the grass and trim the hedges or, in another scenario, to terra-form an entire property, complete with a new deck, sheds, a koi-pond and stone pathway. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Erdle
The franchisor’s appeal of that decision to the Superior Court was dismissed in January 2017 and a further appeal to the Court of Appeal was dismissed in 2018. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Pfizer Case The Delaware Superior Court’s decision in Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 10:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The superior court granted the anti-SLAPP motion as to the defamation claim but not the other two causes of action. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:21 am by Rachel Casper
This joint notice procedure was prescribed by the Supreme Judicial Court in Pettingell v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
  The PRA also addresses the constitutional concerns discussed by the Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]