Search for: "Chancellor v. Chancellor"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,431
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2024, 3:17 am
Yesterday, in McRitchie v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:00 pm
Hammad & Hammad v Paolini. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
The Court reiterated its case law to the effect that conclusions expressed on the motives or possible intentions of a third party constituted a value judgment rather than a factual assertion lending itself to proof (Diena and Ozolins v Latvia n.16657/03 and Ungváry and Irodalom Kft v Hungary n.64520/10 considered). [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
Plaintiffs alleged that Data Domain's directors violated their fiduciary duties in the context of a sale of control of the company under Revlon v. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
In Gulshan v Lord Chancellor [2023] EWCA Civ 306, the issue was the refusal of permission for judicial review of the decision not to allow Mr Gulshan to bring his kirpan into Ealing Magistrates Court because it was longer than the six inches permitted under the Security and Safety Operating Procedures Guidance issued by HM Courts & Tribunals Service. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:56 pm
Air Products and Chemicals Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:20 am
Tenure v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 4:30 am
The Appellate Division disagreed, noting that despite her resignation, there was still a possibility that Individual could return to work in the future, and thus her resignation was not irrevocable, citing Folta v Sobol, 210 AD2d 857.In Folta an employee resigned while the adjudication of disciplinary charges filed against the employee pursuant to Education Law §3020-a were pending. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:40 am
According to ITV news the Lord Chancellor Liz Truss talked of a ‘rampant compensation culture’. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
(pictured), in Auriga Capital Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:13 am
Gyles v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
An “allegation that a transaction involves a controlling stockholder who stands on both sides is a serious one because it imposes fiduciary duties on the controlling stockholder and potentially strips directors of the deferential business judgment rule,” see Reith v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 2:32 pm
[Brennan Center for Justice] * Reflections from Richard Levick on Peter Thiel v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:27 am
Kahn v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:00 am
Slights III, in Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
City of Dearborn Police and Fire Revised Retirement System (Chapter 23) et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 7:52 am
On May 2, 2018, Santa Barbara's Chancellor had the campus flag flown at half-mast to honor Geoffrey’s three decades of service to the campus. [read post]
14 May 2014, 6:02 am
District Court for the District of Delaware captioned ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:30 am
Very few people remember, however, the Court's first reproductive rights case, Skinner v. [read post]
