Search for: "Cooper v State"
Results 601 - 620
of 8,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
Held: In the context of the Framework Decision, the most obvious purpose of insisting EAWs being issued by “judicial authority” was to ensure objectivity (including freedom from political or executive influence) in decision-making and to enhance confidence in a system that was going to lead to a new level of mutual cooperation, including the surrender of member states’ own nationals to other member states. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:48 am
Held: In the context of the Framework Decision, the most obvious purpose of insisting EAWs being issued by “judicial authority” was to ensure objectivity (including freedom from political or executive influence) in decision-making and to enhance confidence in a system that was going to lead to a new level of mutual cooperation, including the surrender of member states’ own nationals to other member states. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:00 am
§ 1983, and in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:22 pm
In the case captioned Alegria v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
As I explain in more detail below as I parse the complaint in the United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Thronson, Mary Pat Treuthart, Yolanda Vázquez, Robin Walker Sterling, Richard A. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:26 pm
As a mutual insurance company, the defendant was “owned cooperatively by its policyholders,” LaPlant, slip op. at 1, and paid dividends to policyholders out of its profits. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:52 am
In the wake of the oral argument in King v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 2:20 am
Israel) at the International Court of Justice Miłosz Gapsa, Broadening the Bindingness of the Provisional Measures Order in South Africa v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm
In 1982, the New York Court of Appeals (ie the supreme court in the state of NY) had held in Cooper that NY courts did not have such power. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
A political subdivision of the State may provide for the defense and indemnification of its officers and employees sued in state or federal court involving the performance of official duties Bonilla v Town of Hempstead, 2015 NY Slip Op 06916, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentFormer Hempstead Town Clerk Mark A. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
Cooper Cameron Corp (Fed. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:05 am
In Benitez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
”) State v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 5:54 am
Cooper Industries, LLC, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:53 am
There is also a domestic challenge to treaty power in the United States, embodied in Bond v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:22 pm
Each week Wise Law Blog reviews recent decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.R. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm
by Karl Coplan The principle environmental regulatory programs in the United States work on a principle of cooperative federalism. [read post]
