Search for: "Cooper v. California"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,590
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2017, 3:53 am
Schickman is a partner with Freeland Cooper & Foreman LLP in San Francisco, California. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 4:58 pm
In Retail Wholesale & Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm
Bray notes that liberal attorneys general and other plaintiffs tended to challenge Bush administration policies in the more liberal federal courts of California, while conservative litigants often chose to challenge Obama policies before the more conservative district and circuit judges of Texas. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
June 12, 1942, an Information was filed in the District Court for Northern California charging a violation of the Act of March 21, 1942, in that petitioner had knowingly remained within the area covered by Exclusion Order No. 34. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:42 pm
June 12, 1942, an Information was filed in the District Court for Northern California charging a violation of the Act of March 21, 1942, in that petitioner had knowingly remained within the area covered by Exclusion Order No. 34. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:25 pm
In response, the Tribal Lenders claimed that the CFPB lacked jurisdiction to investigate them and, after their offer of cooperation was rejected by the Bureau, challenged the CIDs in a California federal court. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:37 pm
A different set of proposals involves private-sector companies stepping up to provide retirement programs on their own or in cooperation with gig companies. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:39 am
Gonzalez-Perez, V. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 4:10 pm
On January 11, 2017, the California Supreme Court by unanimous order granted review in yet another CEQA case, Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
(remanding for full hearing on equitable tolling); Cooper v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
In light of the California Supreme Court’s decision in California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 8:14 am
Meet Marriage of Sagonowsky On December 21, 2016, San Francisco based First Appellate District issued a partly published decision in the case of Sagonoswky v. [read post]
California Appeals Court Holds Negligence Action Against Therapist is Barred by Litigation Privilege
4 Jan 2017, 12:19 pm
In Cady v. [read post]
California Appeals Court Holds Negligence Action Against Therapist is Barred by Litigation Privilege
4 Jan 2017, 12:19 pm
In Cady v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 5:25 pm
Perhaps most infamously, Cooper was among the attorneys who argued in defense of California’s Proposition 8, which sought to ban same-sex marriage. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:05 am
Most of the convictions result from conduct that took place in California, and some indicted individuals await trial there. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm
In Galarza v. [read post]
