Search for: "Department of Insurance v. Doe"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am
JUST CLICK ON THE CASE NAMES BELOW… Appellate Court Compensation Case Zurich American Insurance Company v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 2:44 pm
” But insurance company claim departments don’t always act in a normal way. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 3:22 am
Driscoll, in Deerin v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:07 pm
Department of Labor (DOL) recently published three Unemployment Insurance Program Letters (UIPLs) offering guidance on the administration of separate sections of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or the “CARES Act,” that provide for expanded unemployment insurance benefits. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:59 pm
On July 17, 2020, the Fourth Department denied that motion and, as far as I can tell, the policyholder did not move the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal, ending that action.Phillips v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:38 am
Insurers may see increased exposure on employers' liability policies in 2010, particularly related to noise-related personal injuries, as the effects of the so-called textile deafness test litigation are felt in the industry.In Baker v Quantum Clothing Group [2009] EWCA Civ 499 the Court of Appeal held that an employer's liability for noise-induced hearing loss could arise 12 years earlier than had previously been thought. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:00 am
Olsen v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm
A statement or representation that invites an insured policyholder to submit a claim when the policyholder does not have covered damage to insured property. 2. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:54 am
These were the bare bones facts in Lombardi, Walsh v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 6:58 am
Co, v Rapid Settlements Ltd. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:24 am
Co. v Watnick, 80 NY2d at 546). [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 7:13 am
This 2004, case is titled, "Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 5:00 am
Some factors that a public employer wishing to obtain the services of a retired public employee should considerMeehan v County of Suffolk, 2016 NY Slip Op 07163, Appellate Division, Second Department, [Roslyn I], consolidated with Meehan v County of Suffolk, 2016 NY Slip Op 07164, Appellate Division, Second Department, [Roslyn II]These two decisions address questions that resulted when an individual was engaged to perform certain services by a public entity… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:37 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Fire Insurance Exchange v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:10 am
The Northern District of Illinois in Astellas US Holding, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:11 pm
Earlier this week, the Appellate Division, 2d Department, granted defendant's leave to appeal from the decision of the Appellate Term in Infinity Health Prods., Ltd. v Eveready Ins. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:49 pm
As the legislative history surrounding one of the relevant statutory enactments -- and cited by the majority -- accurately reflects: "Unfortunately, the industry reports that the State Department of Insurance has a difficult time enforcing laws and regulations designed to prevent the unfair and anti-competitive practice of providing compensation to inmates for soliciting the business of detained individuals. [read post]
