Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 601 - 620 of 107,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Other segments offer guidance on radically changing how the federal government works and what it does. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 1:30 am by Orin S. Kerr
Not even the government, in its opposition brief on appeal, thought Karo was relevant enough to the geofence warrant issue to cite it even once. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 3:42 pm
Such an assertion does not remotely amount to an allegation that 124,000 ineligible voters cast ballots, or that 124,000 invalid mail-in ballots were cast. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The book argues that the binary state-versus-federal-government model that is today taken to be the essence of American federalism does not correspond to the legal or political reality of the United States in the early nineteenth century. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 12:15 am
  Nor does the statute bestow on a party a right to know the reasons for the DFPI's choice. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The Constitution, Keith Thirion of the Alliance for Justice observes, “does not specify the size of the Court, and Congress originally set it at six members. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
Before issuing a PPO under that provision, the Michigan Court of Appeals requires a court to find that "a prior posting violates that statute. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:06 pm by Orin S. Kerr
  That's where the new ruling comes in: The Court of Appeal rejected the arguments of Snap and Meta, ordering them to comply with the subpoenas on the ground that the § 2702 privacy wall does not apply to Instagram accounts or Snapchat accounts—and perhaps lots of other kinds of accounts. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 12:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
This case thus does not fall into the unique context addressed by the Supreme Court in Rhinehart. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 10:31 am by Phil Dixon
Supreme Court may be sought (or after it is denied), or when the time to appeal a case has expired without an appeal. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
That court held that section 18-9-111(1)(h) does not violate the constitutional right to freedom of speech because it prohibits only fighting words, and there is no constitutional right to use fighting words. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:57 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Secondly, a look into national law does not produce any generally recognised principles. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 5:00 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
The appeals court held a spouse seeking maintenance does not have to show a financial need, noting need is just one factor under the statute. [read post]