Search for: "Does 1 - 19"
Results 601 - 620
of 20,597
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2022, 10:39 am
This article does not address the potential impacts of the numerous other local, state and federal orders that have been issued in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including, without limitation, potential liability should an employee become ill, requirements regarding family leave, sick pay, and other issues. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 10:12 am
” However, companies may still be required to establish that an agreement, engagement or joint venture does not violate antitrust laws. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 9:19 am
The ordinance does provide an exemption for employees who are “first responders,” or health care providers as defined in California Government Code section 12945.2. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
” The EEOC does note that, “as a practical matter,” however, “doctors and other health care professionals may be too busy during and immediately after a pandemic outbreak to provide fitness-for-duty documentation;” Employers may screen for COVID-19 during the hiring process; Employers may delay the start date of employees with COVID-19 symptoms or positive results; and Employers may withdraw a job offer to a recently hired employee that tests… [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am
Michigan 14-8106Issue: (1) Whether Miller v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:43 am
If so, What does this say about human nature.7) Taking responsibility. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:22 am
Aug. 31, 2022) (jury deciding that COVID-19 caused physical loss or damage after presentation of expert evidence).[1] These recent decisions should be encouraging for policyholders with COVID-19 insurance claims. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:13 pm
The massive layoffs resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic[1] place employer trade secrets at risk. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am
In a prior post, I discussed where you could find the rapidly changing COVID-19 laws. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
Temporary COVID-19 Foreclosure Safeguards. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 2:51 pm
Likewise, the content is not tailored to any particular situation and does not necessarily address all relevant issues. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:02 am
Another American court in G & A Family Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Smokin’ Pig BBQ & Others v American Family Insurance Company 1: 20-CV-03912-JPB has held that State-imposed Covid-19 restrictions do not qualify as a “direct physical loss” under the insurance policy held by the insureds. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:45 pm
Here are five issues California businesses must understand regarding the legislative environment of COVID-19 liability, and the potential to have employees or customers waive liability related to contracting COVID-19. 1. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:06 pm
Does v. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
Dillingham Constr., N.A., Inc., 519 U.S. 316, 330-31 (1997), we hold that ERISA does not preempt the provisions. 08a0348p.062008/09/19 USA v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:14 am
For millions of people who contracted COVID-19, the virus... [read post]
18 May 2020, 1:28 pm
— Does Miami Beach’s COVID-19 panhandling restriction violate free speech? [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
Gerken (Yale) has published In Praise of Rankings, 19 Widener L.J. 1 (2009). [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 9:54 am
The statute does include a minimal carve-out for healthcare facilities, healthcare providers and physicians. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 4:36 pm
This question is important from a public health perspective, complicated from a legal one, and almost certain to create controversy.[1] This bulletin is intended to provide a high-level summary of our current legal analysis[2] on this issue, including on the following subjects: (1) the permissibility of requiring COVID-19 vaccinations; and (2) the exceptions to a vaccination requirement. [read post]
