Search for: "Does 1-188" Results 601 - 620 of 684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm by The Blog Team
§2B1.1(b)(11)(C), because this provision does not apply to personal tax returns. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
This appeal arises from a legislative invocation given by an invited, guest speaker before the opening of a Jacksonville 1 I. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  (The city does, however, promptly and efficiently remove gang graffiti from anywhere it is publicly visible, a policy of which I approve and from which I have personally benefited.)With one exception, every single invocation delivered since this policy was adopted (and many delivered before it was adopted) has been sectarian, and I have no doubt whatsoever that this is just how the City Council likes it as the majority faction on the board all wear their religion on their sleeves. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Congress extended the moratorium, after a brief lapse, for 2018 and 2019.[7] Absent an extension of the moratorium, it is scheduled to take effect again on January 1, 2020. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
  Pennsylvania precedent does not support the public nuisance claim plaintiffs advance here, and we cannot predict that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will choose to expand state public nuisance law in the manner plaintiffs urge.Id. at 421 (citations to Lead Industries, Leo, and Camden omitted)In Sheridan v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am by Andy Foreman
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:51 am by Durga Rao
Patel Engineering Ltd. and Another (2006 AIR (SC) 450: 2005 (3) ArbLR 285: 2005 (8) SCC 618: 2005 (9) Scale 1: 2005 (9) JT 219: 2005 (7) Supreme 610: 2005 (7) SCJ 461: 2005 (5) CTC 302). [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:13 am by Durga Rao Vanayam
Patel Engineering Ltd. and Another (2006 AIR (SC) 450: 2005 (3) ArbLR 285: 2005 (8) SCC 618: 2005 (9) Scale 1: 2005 (9) JT 219: 2005 (7) Supreme 610: 2005 (7) SCJ 461: 2005 (5) CTC 302). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  These ATTM allies argue that it does not matter what the evidence in a case would show, that it does not matter what the state law at issue says, and that there is simply a federal right for any corporation to put in any contract a term that bans class actions (so long as the contract includes an arbitration clause). [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:06 am by Maksym Vishchyk
Thus, the imposed treaty is absolutely void in its entirety and ab initio (VCLT, Articles 44(5), 69(1)). [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:21 am
It does not impede, let alone entirely foreclose, general use of the courts by would-be plaintiffs. . . . [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
The aftermath of Copenhagen: does international law have a role to play in a global response to climate change? [read post]