Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 601 - 620
of 9,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm
To ensure this Convention remains focused on investigations of cybercrimes and does not become a vehicle for investigating any and all offenses, Article 35 should be limited to global cooperation on offenses set out in Articles 6-16. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 6:21 pm
Patent No. 6,781,231 (the ‘231 patent), but that claim 1 is invalid pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
The BoA does not admit said request into the appeal proceedings. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am
Furthermore, if a certain fraction derived from a prior art polymer has properties that fall within the scope of the claims, does this polymer then make the composition as claimed available to the public? [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 11:01 pm
The Bilski case involves questions of whether an invention can fit within the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 101 if the invention does not specifically require the use of “technology. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:01 pm
The decision in Ben Grubb and Telstra Corporation Limited ([2015] AICmr 35) is fascinating. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 9:43 pm
But even if it does, you should note that a lower starting price does not prevent the permit’s eventual price from skyrocketing. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 1:50 pm
The construction deadline in question stems from Section 27.14(g), which requires 700 MHz B Block folks both to provide signal coverage and to offer service over at least 35% of the geographic area of their licenses by one of two dates, either (1) June 13, 2013 (if the initial authorization was granted on June 13, 2009 or earlier), or (2) within four years of the initial license grant. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:08 am
The disagreement related to whether exception 2 does indeed authorize such pro-abortion speech. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 2:50 am
It does not represent our support or opposition to the statute. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 5:42 am
First, Appellants contend that this rejection is overcome “if the objection to the specification under 35 [U.S.C. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 5:15 pm
It is OK to follow such "polls" as long as one does not take them seriously. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:00 pm
Code 1975, �_25-5-35(d)(1)-(4) addresses claims due to injury which occurred outside of Alabama. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:48 am
Facebook had wanted to join its prior case, because its later-filed case would have otherwise been time-barred under § 315(b)(1-year post-service timeline does “not apply to a request for joinder”). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm
Grant's testimony does not save Group I claims from indefiniteness. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:19 pm
Whether adjusting a dose of an old drug based on a patient’s genetic risk of poorly metabolizing it is eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:47 am
Both patents have the same inventive entity as the ’638 patent and thus cannot qualify as prior art under (previous) 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm
Louis traffic ticket case start at $35. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm
Louis traffic ticket case start at $35. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:13 pm
Louis traffic ticket case start at $35. [read post]
