Search for: "Does 1-68" Results 601 - 620 of 2,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2011, 8:00 am by Matt C. Bailey
L, at 67-68; Brunell Decl., Docket No. 142, ¶ 5 (Operators "regularly have much more than 30-minutes of uninterrupted time every five hours during their shifts to eat their meals"). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:21 pm by Jim Butler
What is a “Targeted Employment Area” and what does it mean for an investor? [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 10:26 am by PaulKostro
., A-3122-08T4, February 16, 2010: The New Jersey Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-53 to -95 (the “UCCJEA”), provides in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-65(a) that, except as otherwise provided in N.J.S.A. 2A:34-68, A court of this State has jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination only if: (1) this State is the home state of the child on the date of the commencement of the proceeding, or was the home state of the child within six… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:14 pm
L. 1, 9 (1989). [146] Repression, supra note 10, at 11. [147] Bloody, supra note 67, at 23. [148] Id. . [149]Repression, supra note 10, at 11. [150] Id. [151] Allison, supra note 68, slide 63. [152] Id. slide 72. [153] Brown, supra note 1, at 1075. [154]Mary-Anne Toy, Olympic Jitter behind China's Organ Pledge, THE SYDNEY MORNING HERALD, Oct. 10, 2007, ¶ 1, available at http://organharvestinvestigation.net/media/smh_101007.htm (last visited July… [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 12:56 pm
This principle is not a rule: the law does permit wrong doers to profit from their wrongs in a variety of circumstances. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
Does an unaccepted offer of judgment to a named plaintiff moot that plaintiff’s claims? [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, when the question of whether the decision is sufficiently reasoned, it is decisive whether the requirements of the then applicable R 68(2), first sentence, have been complied with.[16] According to R 68(2), first sentence, decisions which are open to appeal have to be reasoned. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Jessica Jones, Matrix Chambers
As a result, the phrase “person acting in an official capacity” had to mean the same in s 134 as it does in article 1 of UNCAT: [23]. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:48 am
We thus affirm the summary judgment of nonenablement as to claims 1, 9, and 10 of the '432 patent; claims 1 and 2 of the '243 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 9-12, and 16-18 of the '861 patent; and claims 1-5, 8-36, 41-44, 46-68, and 70-79 of the '444 patent because clear and convincing evidence establishes that a person of ordinary skill in the art did not and could not accomplish automatic computer determination of teeth finish positions… [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, the board observes that claim 1 does not require that the damping ratio remain fixed throughout a maneuver. [read post]
28 May 2017, 5:26 am by Tibbie McIntyre
In the U.S., the factors to be considered when examining the use of the work are (s 107 of the Copyright Law of the United States); 1. [read post]