Search for: "Downs v. State of California"
Results 601 - 620
of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of California for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
Supreme Court ruled that the race-conscious admissions programs used by Harvard College and University of North Carolina (UNC) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, effectively striking down the use of affirmative action programs for college and university admissions across the country (Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:35 am
State of California and Syncora Guarantee Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 12:43 pm
Soledad, California cross and memorial was handed down. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
Regents of the University of California 17-1003 Issues: (1) Whether the acting secretary of the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether the acting secretary’s decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 12:49 pm
State of California, et al. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 12:49 pm
State of California, et al. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
The Court struck down two requirements. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 1:48 pm
The case might come down to expert witnesses testifying during a trial with differing opinions about whether the test results were accurate or inaccurate. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
In addition, in cases such as Pike v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:26 pm
The Idaho case is State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:25 pm
Like other sanctuary cases currently in the federal courts, United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
Last week, the day the case came down, we threw up a quick post with our very preliminary thoughts about Conte v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 12:41 pm
(Hassell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 3:31 pm
That is, until the Court of Appeal came down with its decision in the case of SB Liberty, LLC, v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:20 pm
The state supreme court (California) required a filing of a post-conviction petition seeking review of an adverse lower court decision within a reasonable time. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 3:25 pm
In August, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:40 am
I could be down for that.But filing a lawsuit that in 2018 that says that California should ditch its winner-take-all rules isn't my particular cup of tea. [read post]
