Search for: "England v. United States"
Results 601 - 620
of 2,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2016, 6:54 pm
The reasoning of the CJEU in GAT v LuK was equally applicable here. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
The strained attempts by the collected Primates to hold on to unity took two directions after the Tanzania gathering: on the one hand, they placed their hopes in a new Anglican Covenant; and on the other, they tried to establish arrangements for alternative pastoral oversight within the divided churches of Canada and the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
In 1914, in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
Marijuana is the most lucrative cash crop in the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:11 am
For example, 24 (or 12.7%) of the 2009 securities lawsuit filings involved companies that are domiciled outside the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 6:05 pm
Mabus of the United States Navy, and Robert M. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But it has often played a similar role in historical writing on the United States after the Revolution, and especially in historical writing on federalism. [read post]
16 May 2016, 10:39 am
In the United States, there is, of course Feist Publication, Inc. v Rural Telephone Service Company, on telephone directories, and Victor Lalli Enterprises, Inc. v Big Red Apple, Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:19 am
Other than this, there are no rules relating to DNA retention at the United States federal level.Whether the DNA that is retained is held as a sample or profile may also be relevant for privacy concerns:? [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
Indeed, it’s the judiciary who have largely sustained this robust (but mostly fair) approach to human rights law in England and Wales. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:32 pm
OBG Ltd et al v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:41 am
Last week’s decision by the 8th District in State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:24 am
(“BDI”) appeals from a finaljudgment of the United States District Court for theSouthern District of New York holding BDI’s asserteddesign patent invalid on summary judgment and alsodismissing BDI’s trade dress claims with prejudice. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:24 am
United States
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
