Search for: "GENERATION X INC." Results 601 - 620 of 1,461
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2018, 7:02 am by Eric Athey
General Nutrition Centers, Inc. the Superior Court of Pennsylvania (an intermediate appellate court) considered the status of FWW plans under the PMWA. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 8:16 am by Brett Trout
Mensah is the Chairman of Supercond Technology Inc. of Norcross, Georgia. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:53 am by Schachtman
App’x 633, 638 (9th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
  Still other of the hypotheticals (e.g., married-student housing at a religious college) would better be viewed not as implicating compelled speech, but instead, as David Cole suggested at argument, as raising the question whether the Court would, or might, craft additional exceptions to the general free exercise doctrine of Employment Division v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 The last blog post on Madden v Midland Funding discussed a fresh law review article advocating that other circuits embrace the Second Circuit’s holding that assignees of national banks do not “inherit” National Bank Act protection so as to allow them to collect interest at a rate that was not usurious when charged by the bank that owned the account (thanks to federal preemption protection), but exceeded the usury limits in the state in which Midland Funding, LLC, the… [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:02 pm by Nate Nead
[ix] Jones Lang LaSalle IP Inc., The Rise of Self-Storage in Asia Pacific, (2017). [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Prometheus Labs., Inc., 132 S. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:46 am by Eugene Volokh
First, there was no tradition “supporting the notion that divorce proceedings” were “excepted” from the general rule of access. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
In a 2013 enforcement action against Midland, its servicer, and its parent company, the Texas Attorney General averred that the price Midland pays is 3.3% of the face value of the debt.Excerpt from State's Amended Original Petition in Cause No, 2011-40626 - STATE OF TEXAS (ACTING BY AND THROUGH ATTORNEY GEN vs. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
In a 2013 state AG enforcement action against Midland for illegal debt collection practices, its servicer, and its parent company, the Texas Attorney General averred that the price Midland pays is 3.3% of the face value of the debt.Excerpt from State's Amended Original Petition in Cause No, 2011-40626 - STATE OF TEXAS (ACTING BY AND THROUGH ATTORNEY GEN vs. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:03 am by Ad Law Defense
App’x —, 2015 WL 3560722 at *3 (11th Cir. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:03 am by Ad Law Defense
App’x —, 2015 WL 3560722 at *3 (11th Cir. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
But would the Court of Appeal follow the General Court’s lead and come out in favour of the mark? [read post]