Search for: "Gordon v. Gordon" Results 601 - 620 of 2,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2018, 5:50 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Supreme Court denied certiorari in Michael Gordon Reynolds v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:24 am by Joseph Arshawsky
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 The post USA: Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 11:17 am by Eric Goldman
However, Lexmark didn’t change the requirement that the claims at issue constitute “commercial advertising or promotion” (as defined in the seminal Gordon & Breach ruling, incorporated into the 10th Circuit’s Proctor & Gamble v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 11:10 am by Anushka Limaye
Robert Chesney provided an in-depth analysis of the legal and policy lessons learned from Doe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm by Schachtman
Haynes, Gordon Guyatt, and Peter Tugwell, Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:36 am by INFORRM
  True, Sir Philip can afford expensive lawyers, but on any view this was no longer a David v Goliath case. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:13 am by Lasse Søndergaard Christensen
Lasse Søndergaard Christensen and Kathrine Spinner MadsenIn a recent decision from 1 October 2018 (B-2740-17) the Danish Eastern High Court affirmed a decision of the Danish Commercial Court from December 2017 (V-8-17) in which the court had ruled that a café in Copenhagen had infringed the trademark rights and copyrights to the character Obelix which rightfully belongs to Les Editions Albert René S.A.R.L (Albert René). [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:43 am by Sara Parrello
Indeed, both Upjohn and before Bristol-Myers Squibb and Others v Paranova (joined Cases C-427/93, 429/93 and 436/93) had indicated that “the requirement of artificial partitioning of the markets does not imply that the importer must demonstrate (emphasis added) that, by putting an identical product on the market in varying forms of packaging in different Member States, the trade mark proprietor deliberately sought to partition the markets between Member States“. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am by Cheryl Beise
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 The post USA: Real Foods Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:59 am by Sara Moran
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post United Kingdom: Sandoz Limited & anr v G.D. [read post]