Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,036
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2014, 9:39 am
The concurring opinion by Justice Ming Chin, joined by retiring Justice Marvin Baxter, is of interest as well. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am
In the six briefs discussed in this post, the Solicitor General recommends that the Court grant review in only one case, B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:45 am
Mandatory retirement provisions within partnership agreements do not violate labour laws or human rights, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled today in McCormick v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
Board Certified in Labor & Employment Law, Past Chair of the ABA RPTE Employee Benefit & Other Compensation Arrangements Group, Co-Chair and Past Chair of the ABA RPTE Welfare Plan Committee, Vice Chair of the ABA TIPS Employee Benefit Plans Committee, Vice President of the North Texas Health Care Compliance Professionals Association, Past Chair of the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Section and the former Board Compliance Chair of the… [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:38 am
At the same time, the board removed the employee and coworker as trustees of the retirement plan. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:36 am
In City of Pittsburgh v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:16 am
Granted, Barry had very little time to speak, since he was only a “panelist” (and apparently a late addition at that) and not a full-fledged “speaker” on the session. [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:00 am
This finding, said the ALJ, was supported not only by the plain language of that provision but by the fact that "when the parties intended to affect a benefit granted to current employees that continues into retirement, they specifically so state. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
Most of the attention on yesterday’s grants focused on the announcement that the Court would review Yates v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces demonstrated in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
Stephens, 13-7211 (granted at the March 21 Conference, relisted once); Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 2:48 am
In that case, the second wife, who was stymied in her effort to sell her majority stake on a control basis to a major publishing house, failed to convince the court to invalidate the voting agreement which port-mortem left board control in her stepchildren’s hands even upon a sale of the shares to an outside buyer. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:44 pm
(County of Riverside v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
The court granted the motion, saying “Although copyright is a strict liability statute, there should still be some element of volition or causation which is lacking where a defendant&rs [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:25 am
Moreover, the two individual defendants were protected by qualified immunity where the employee failed to demonstrate a material issue as to whether they violated a clearly established due process right (Potter v Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, March 21, 2014, McCormack, M). [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:56 pm
Madigan v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm
” Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 11:20 am
” That was the holding of the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the ongoing saga of Retired Employees Association of Orange County v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
A board certified labor and e [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
In Legislature v. [read post]
