Search for: "HASTINGS v. US "
Results 601 - 620
of 792
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 1:43 am
One such case is Brandeaux Advisers (UK) Ltd and others v Ruth Chadwick [2010] EWHC 3241 (QB), a decision of Mr Justice Jack late last year but only recently spotted by this Kat. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:40 am
Naxos, 830 NE 2d 250 (2005).See Goldstein v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:51 pm
See Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure, Section 1210.02, Fourth Edition (April 2005); citing Institut National des Appellations D'Origine v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Jacobson (4th Cir. 1993) (recognizing the "concern that the jury's very knowledge that pseudonyms were being used" could "tend to validate" the plaintiff's claims); see also Doe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 10:39 am
No jokes hereSheldon v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:14 am
To use an analogy, why would you want to tout your common ground with the local bully who beats his wife and intimidates his neighbors? [read post]
21 Sep 2024, 5:00 pm
The case of University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 11:44 am
It takes its name from the famous case, Desny v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 6:09 pm
Bommai v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:29 am
Perhaps the best explanation found by Judge Pauley was the haste with which the buyout agreement was negotiated and closed. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 10:21 am
Further reading: Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 11:49 am
The constitutional implications of mass quantities of data were at the heart of five Justices’ concurrences in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
In an essay for Notice and Comment, Professor Zachary Price of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law cautioned that a Trump Administration loss in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
