Search for: "Herring v. Commissioner" Results 601 - 620 of 3,286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2014, 9:58 am by Lisa Kömives
  The Commissioners argued that the case was controlled by Waskovich v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:46 pm by Lisa Stam
 While the Jones v Tsigecase involves two employees, there is nothing that prevents an employee from taking his or her employer to court over a privacy issues. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Determining the status and rights of an employee in the public service terminated from his or her employmentHanson v Crandell, 2016 NY Slip Op 05604, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Supreme Court dismissed William A. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:48 am
As reported by her Honour, BMW Plastics’ thinking was that the Commissioner could provide the benefit of technical expertise which the Court might otherwise not have and there might be a costs saving. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
For her part, Laura argued that they were not mistaken at all in 2006, because the account did exist then. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another, heard 21 -22 February 2011. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
It said that although the marriage between Vega and the parolee was noted in the disciplinary charges, the basis for her termination was her violation of the rule prohibiting departmentemployees from fraternizing with inmates, former inmates or parolees.Accordingly, Vega's discipline and ultimate termination was not based on her marriage itself.Laspisa v Mahoney, A.D.2d 279, is another case involving an individual dismissed from her position after… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:30 pm by Sme
Curry County Board of Commissioners (10th Cir., June 25, 2015 -- persuasive) (very brief case upholding Billy's termination, based on failure-to-raise and lower court's "thorough opinions")Armelin v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 6:11 pm by Team
Kanagaratnam and her 3 minor children M. , G., A. claimed asylum at the passport control of the airport of Brussels (art.50ter law December 15th 1980). [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But litigants should know that damages are limited in the DHR, including damages for pain and suffering.The case is Town of Hempstead v. [read post]