Search for: "Hobbs v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
The case presents the question whether a Hobbs Act conspiracy to commit extortion requires that the conspirators agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am
From Thursday's Finchem v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Hobbs, Dir., Ark. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Hobbs, Dir., Ark. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
In a country (and culture) that sometimes appears to believe that prevention of even one terrorist attack justifies immense costs in terms both of money and deprivations of ordinary liberty, it is at least worth noting the remarkable indifference of much of the public—and certainly the whole of the Republican Party—to the costs attached to offering the kind of capacious interpretation of the Second Amendment instantiated in the recent case of New York State Rifle & Pistol… [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
Hobbs (10-9647); the Court granted review of the two separately, but said that it will hear oral arguments in them back-to-back. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:07 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:31 am
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) – On November 13, the Supreme Court agreed to decide whether the Hobbs Act (also known as the Administrative Orders Review Act) requires the district court to accept the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) interpretation of the TCPA, in PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm
Even before Trump v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
In Winfield v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
” State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Hendrick v Tony Knight (O-323-14) is a decision of Appointed Person Geoffrey Hobbs QC, involving the sadly-known Tony Knight. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm
Hobbs (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket: 10-9647 Issue(s): Whether imposing a sentence of life without possibility of parole on an offender who was 14 at the time he committed capital murder constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:02 am
., writes: In United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:50 pm
United States, 62 Fed. [read post]
