Search for: "Houston v. State" Results 601 - 620 of 2,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2010, 6:27 am by Nabiha Syed
United States and Gould v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am by Adam Chandler
United States and United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 11:20 am by Mark S. Humphreys
" As stated by the Texas Supreme Court in 2009, in the case, State Farm Lloyds v Johnson, "Almost all insurance policies contain provisions specifying appraisal as a means of resolving disputes regarding the 'amount of loss' for a covered claim. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
Institute a sui generis law for priority rights in Paris Convention countries equally, regardless of whether those states recognise a legal/equitable distinction. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:47 pm by Peter Tillers
-Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref'd) (explaining that the "standard set by our high court for the timely assertion of objections is both demanding and unforgiving"); see Graham v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 8:38 am
Merck (Houston, TX) 5/21/07 . . . [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District, Houston Division, issued an opinion on January 24, 2012, in a case styled, Bender Square Partners v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
Thuraissigiam) After an otherwise somber discussion, stay tuned at the end for some light-hearted frivolity celebrating the improbable recent surge of the New York Mets and the fully-probable and ongoing surge of the Houston Astros. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:58 pm
Recently, the Texas Court of Appeals overturned a trial court's judgment against the medical center that provided care to an injured worker in Hand and Wrist Center of Houston v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
United States, a federal lawsuit by a former Internal Revenue Service employee who was fired after she insisted on wearing her kirpan in a Houston federal office building. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Suit was filed this week in a Texas state trial court by a church challenging a Houston-area utility district's insistence that the church pay a capital recovery fee of $83,780 rather than the actual cost of $24,900 to connect its new office building and auditorium to the district's water system. [read post]