Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 19,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:33 am
Here's the abstract:In the case concerning Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 6:24 am
The case is "Grand Stevens and others v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
Some would argue that it is an imposition on human freedom. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:00 am
” Full story The Guardian, 1st February 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk Related link: Full judgment: ZH (Tanzania) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Data-Driven Regulatory Governance and Its Distorting Effects V. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:05 am
V. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 1:34 pm
The Supreme Court, in 1992’s United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:25 pm
Department of Agriculture, and the difference between the treatment of "Harvestland" chickens and those of competitors stated claims for violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, fraud in the inducement, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of express warranty, according to the federal district court in Newark (Hemy v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:45 am
Berrino F, Krogh V et al. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 8:37 am
The complaint (full text) in State of New York v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
The Secretary of State, in serving the judgment, was not directly causing or facilitating any harm to Mr Ismail and was therefore not in breach of any human rights obligations. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:29 pm
The European Court of Human Right’s decision in the case S.A.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Consider, for the moment, the case of State v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:00 am
An 18-year delay by the State Division of Human Rights in issuing its determination characterized as being “jurisprudentially intolerable”Matter of New York State Dept. of Correction and Community Supervision v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 137 AD3d 1512, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIn August 1995 Kenneth W. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 6:47 am
State v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 11:46 am
While the structure and ideology of international human rights law is such that the interests of tribes (and tribal members) are almost always subordinated to the interests of aspirant members and the public, CANZUS states (the affluent western settler states of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United States) have been able to augment domestic human rights law in order to provide normative space for tribal self-constitution. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 9:02 am
" [Crisel v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 6:35 am
United States (E.D. [read post]
4 May 2016, 11:39 am
The US Supreme Court is weighing a decision over President Obama’s DAPA Program, Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents, in the case of United States v. [read post]
