Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF J. A. C."
Results 601 - 620
of 5,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2022, 4:33 am
James C. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
by Michael C. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 7:22 pm
This section discusses (a) our shallow understanding of the Cravath firm and lockstep compensation, (b) a new type of market power enjoyed by today’s super-rich firms, and (c) a new type of firm-specific capital grounded in legal expertise combined with data, process, technology, design, and business operations. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
The onus is squarely on a party seeking a derogation from open justice to satisfy the court that such a derogation is necessary for the administration of justice and to protect his or her legitimate interests (as per CPR 39.2), a matter to be decided by carrying out the Re S balancing exercise: Gallagher at [5(vii)]. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
But the rise of politics in the workplace has consequences for polarization across the country, said Johnny C. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 1:40 pm
In fact, as the court noted, when “[c]onfronted with this language at oral argument, government counsel conceded that ‘a rule can be issued, prescribed, or promulgated without publication in the Federal Register or prior to publication in the Federal Register. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
This followed the appointment in 2019 of a Transparency Review Panel which looked into the matter, received evidence and reported back to the President. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
C. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 8:59 am
Paragraphs 7(4)(c)-(d) of Schedule 6 of the Bill would replace ‘in individual cases’ with ‘in particular circumstances’ for these two derogations. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
” Tanya J. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
As a matter of first impression for our Circuit, we hold that the legislative invocation at issue constitutes government speech. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:53 am
At the Department of Justice, for example, he reviewed J. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
J. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:54 am
Matthew J. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 5:28 am
They conclude, quoting the magisterial Columbia Law Review study of the law by Harold Edgar and Benno C. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 11:51 pm
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Cardoso, Connor J. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 11:20 pm
By Steven J. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
See Amy C. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:59 am
” Additionally, “[c]ommunications may be protected by the common legal interest privilege only if those communications further a joint or common interest. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 9:20 am
Id. at 2607-08; id. 2617, 2621 (Gorsuch, J., concurring) (doctrine protects both separation of powers and federalism). [read post]
