Search for: "IP Holdings, Inc." Results 601 - 620 of 1,440
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
But has IP any peculiarity woman-wise, wonders Jeremy? [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
", which Suleman posted last week, Jeremy reflects over the one-law-fits-all-sectors approach and IP. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
  These questions, among other things, find a response in High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division's ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another [2015] EWHC 17 (Ch), which Katfriend Aaron Wood (Swindell & Pearson Ltd) kindly reports. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:08 am by Harry Cole
To support that conclusion the Office cited not only its own previous holdings, but also the Second Circuit’s 2012 decision in the ivi, Inc. case in which the Court said that Section 111 covers only “localized retransmission services … regulated as cable systems by the FCC”. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
  These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
., Invitrogen IP Holdings, Inc., and Applied Biosystems, LLC ("LifeTech"). [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Sanctions Awarded when Defendant Failed to Preserve Relevant Evidence: In Zest IP Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
 And having just launched her own copyright consultancy E-LAWnora, Eleonora provided a comprehensive and detailed account of the 22nd Fordham IP Conference from the heart of beautiful Manhattan - with posts on Aereo here, Enforcement here, fair use and freedom of speech here and copyright revision around the world here. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
        Promoting or holding itself or ALOR out to members of the public as a replacement or successor to PCI or the CHARRIOL brand; suggesting that PCI or CHARRIOL have “merged with” or been “re-branded” as ALOR; promoting, selling, giving away, or otherwise distributing CHARRIOL jewelry under the “ALOR” name, or under any trade name other than CHARRIOL; or otherwise suggesting that PCI endorses or is otherwise… [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:24 am by Jani
 In Monsanto Canada Inc. v Schmeiser the Supreme Court looked at patents relating to genetically modified crops. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 5:31 am by Ben
The Turtles, the 1960s pop band,  have  won a second victory against SiriusXM Holdings Inc. [read post]