Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel"
Results 601 - 620
of 900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2012, 1:48 pm
Advanced Medical Optics, 659 F.3d 835 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:56 am
The appellate panel’s response in State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 3:32 pm
Except you're not. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 2:02 am
Elizabeth Letourneau, who is an associate professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at the Medical University of South Carolina. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm
Then, on re-argument before an en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed and held that these communications were not discoverable. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:06 am
I have represented clients and reviewed medical records for 20+ years. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:22 pm
The consolidated case is called In Re: Pradaxa Products Liability Litigation. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:01 pm
Prescribing physicians and the medical community as a whole were also noted as interested parties in the litigation. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:01 pm
Prescribing physicians and the medical community as a whole were also noted as interested parties in the litigation. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:10 pm
Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are used as antidepressants and antianxiety medications. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:10 pm
Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are used as antidepressants and antianxiety medications. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
The CAS Panel said no. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:07 am
Review of Agency Rules The Texas Medical Board proposed to review Chapter 189, Compliance Program, §§189.1 – 189.14, pursuant to the Texas Government Code, §2001.039. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 6:20 am
Peerwani acted quickly to suspend the employee and review his old cases, but isn't that what he's supposed to do? [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 6:14 pm
Victims identified by medical and social service experts would be granted interim protection while their medical and emotional conditions stabilize. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:00 pm
In the review process, cancer survivors - known as "consumer members" - are encouraged to participate and help other members of the review panel award approximately $15 million to programs available for grant funding. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:00 pm
In the review process, cancer survivors - known as "consumer members" - are encouraged to participate and help other members of the review panel award approximately $15 million to programs available for grant funding. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 4:46 am
This work would be presented at various conferences, and would seek publication in a medical or professional journal following the typical peer review process. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:44 am
(citing In re Neurontin). [read post]
