Search for: "In re: James Smith" Results 601 - 620 of 909
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2011, 5:28 pm by Bernard E. Harcourt
To be crude, Adam Smith is usefully described as a “liberal” economic thinker, and the Chicago School of Economics as “neoliberal. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:58 pm by admin
Smith   The US single-family residential market has hit bottom. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:56 am by admin
Smith    Cities are for walking; it eases traffic congestion. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:04 am by Gritsforbreakfast
At the Dallas County Jail, inmates who're arrested due to an identity mix-up, even in serious cases, have trouble getting the system to document and rectify the error. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 8:01 am by admin
Smith   Yesterday’s post summing up New New Orleans, by comparing the predictions I made at the time with the actual New York Times-reported results, focused on the demographics – a loss of 148,000 people, about 30% of the pre-Katrina population – but that demographic shift is actually not the principal cause but the principal effect. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:50 am by Don Cruse
In some ways, this case echoes the reasoning of last week’s In re Smith decision, which relied primarily on a Texas AG opinion to guide construction of an ambiguous statute. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:31 am by Steve Hall
The Texas Supreme Court ruling in In RE: Billy James Smith is in Adobe .pdf format. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:46 am by Don Cruse
Compensation for wrongful imprisonment when the wrongful conviction also triggers parole revocation In re Billy James Smith, No. 10-0048 (DDB) In this case, the Texas Supreme Court confronted the question whether a wrongfully convicted prisoner could recover for time he spent in prison due to the revocation of a previous parole — caused by that wrongful conviction. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:49 pm by Jim Walker
They're busy trying to make sure criminal cases don't see the light of day. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm by Aaron
Smith: The Court affirmed the trial court’s modification of Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:50 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Includes the text from "King's Speech" : "They're idiots. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:08 am by Russ Bensing
  Is that res judicata or the law of the case? [read post]