Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 601 - 620
of 13,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2007, 8:33 am
But we’re at least pleased to read the transcript, courtesy of the White House. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:12 pm
There's a statute that says that, unlike regular contracts, contracts like this one (e.g., with a decedent for personal services in return for property at death) have to be filed within a year. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:58 am
But when you’re trying to enforce your rights, how do you prove what you have registered? [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:58 am
For those who are wondering, yes we’ll be running the risk (e.g. intake/conflicts/terms) staffing compensation survey again this year. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
In such negotiations, parties will mutually benefit if licensing is available as an alternative to “winging it” re: potential copyright infringement, especially parties who are more risk averse. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:16 am
I know we're not supposed to take notice of the U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
(e.g. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 3:32 pm
Last week I blogged about the uneasy case for a sex-ed licensing scheme that would, with other conditions, serve as a safe harbor from statutory rape prosecutions for sex between and with minors over a certain age (e.g, 15). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:40 am
Tam’s attorney argued that trademarks constitute both commercial (e.g. the band’s name) and non-commercial (e.g., Proud Asians) speech. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
In re JetBlue" [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 12:20 am
Various articles have questioned the legality and morality of the TM (e.g., here), and the BBC ran a story about "unlikely" phrases that are trademarked.Suffice to say a lot has been said about this. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 1:51 pm
Implied falsity is where an ambiguous statement deceives a significant number of reasonable consumers, e.g., “No product is better at preserving memory,” when nobody else can do the job either. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 6:12 pm
For example, in the case of In re Northwest Airlines Litigation, the court refused to allow consumers to sue Northwest Airlines for a violation of its privacy policy. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:14 am
The area around my house, for example, is listed as a permissible zone for sex offenders, but I'm positive that's not true: we're very close to a private elementary school, right across the street from a park, etc. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 1:37 pm
See, e.g., Anne Reed, Eric Turkewitz and Scott Greenfield. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 10:44 am
One of the challenging circumstances often facing an employer is having to make a tough decision (e.g. termination) with respect to an employee who is known to have a protected characteristic under human rights law. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:37 pm
See, e.g. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:19 am
E.g. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 4:08 pm
Although we understand how the statute is supposed to work, we’re left with the small matter of crystalizing the name for prior art that qualifies under post-AIA 102. [read post]
