Search for: "In re Knight"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2010, 10:59 am
Currently, the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system charges for access to federal appellate, district and bankruptcy court records.7 As a result, U.S. federal courts pay private contractors approximately $150 million per year for electronic access to judicial documents.8 While the E-Government Act has mandated that this system change so that this information is as freely available as possible, little progress has been made.9 Congress should consider providing sufficient funds to… [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:31 am
"We're leveraging our experience and expertise with an interdisciplinary team," said Steven Nesmith, one of five team coordinators and a lawyer in Holland & Knight's Washington office. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 11:38 am
Davis, No. 06-666 (state bond issue) Knight v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 1:00 pm
(A U.K. firm referred Holland & Knight the business.) [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 3:18 am
For the Knight Institute, it would put them on the map to win against Trump. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 5:40 am
” (In re Raymond C. (2008) 45 Cal.4th 303, 307 [86 Cal. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:21 am
Not all experts see a strong argument supporting the Knight Institute’s case. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 10:28 am
The Illinois Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS) is a non-law enforcement agency with investigative powers. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 12:49 pm
Interrogatories are limited to 30 questions including subparts UNLESS they’re the Illinois Supreme Court Standard Interrogatories which have 27 questions and 100 sub-questions. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
If you are Suge Knight’s lawyer, this might even land you in jail, depending on what you’re alleged to have said (btw, Mark Geragos gives a really good explanation of this weird case in Episode 138 of his podcast, “Reasonable Doubt” with Adam Carolla). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 5:43 pm
They’re uncertain exactly why. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:50 am
We’re talking 1791 here! [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:46 am
If you're a 3L or a clerk with a Biglaw job offer, congratulations. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 8:08 am
Sometimes they’re even required by our ethics rules or our law firms. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:22 pm
If you’re a first-time attendee, you’d better be prepared. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 4:26 pm
Why did it take a re-examination request to find all of the prior art that was not found initially? [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 4:22 pm
Healthcare, Inc., 475 F.3d 1228, 1231 (11th Cir. 2007); Knight v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 3:39 am
Not the white knight’s problem. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:43 am
., The University of Houston Law Center 2008-1288 DCT MBO LABS V BECTON [argued] 2009-3104 MSPB RACHAL V MSPB [argued] 2009-1210 BCA BEYLEY CONSTRUCTION V ARMY [argued] 2009-1270 PTO IN RE CHAPMAN [argued] 2009-3193 MSPB KNIGHT V MSPB [on the briefs] Panel L: Tuesday, November 3, 2009, 10:00 A.M., The University of Houston Law Center 2008-1418 DCT HUMAN GENOME V IMMUNEX [argued] 2009-1182 DCT HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES V GENENTECH [argued] 2009-3155 MSPB ARMSTRONG V TREASURY [argued]… [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 2:47 am
John & J.T. continue to record new podcasts, and they’re full of practical and engaging insights from true experts – so stay tuned! [read post]
