Search for: "In re Lopez"
Results 601 - 620
of 839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
And if some podunk department is so small it can't afford such technology - and I don't doubt they're out there given that Texas has more than 2,500 law enforcement agencies, some of them truly minute and obscure - maybe they shouldn't be the ones investigating serious violent felonies in the first place! [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:51 am
Lopez argued that a rule barring all persons from re-applying could have a "disparate impact" on recovering alcoholics/drug abusers. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 12:00 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
Anyway, obviously this is a reading-the-tea-leaves, inside-baseball sort of post, but I suppose that’s what happens when you’re trying to predict how the Supreme Court might rule in a case. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:38 am
Ineffective assistance of counsel claims get a pretty good workout in appeals, but they’re rarely successful. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:42 am
Lopez itself shows that Congressional power can be limited without the activity/inactivity distinction. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:50 am
Ignacio Lopez-Pena studying biophysical chemistry. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Re. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 7:57 pm
I think he has as much chance of getting that done with the House controlled by the Republicans as I do of scoring a night of passion with Jennifer Lopez. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
Court watchers largely viewed Alderman as a logical follow-up to Lopez and the case that followed it, United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Bingham, Lisa Blomgren. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm
On the other hand, you’re probably already consuming more high-fructose corn syrup than is good for you. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
” Lopez v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
We are reposting this edition of “Petitions to watch,” which features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ January 7 conference. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 7:15 pm
ALCO-SENSOR IV - used as a PAS test in California. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:03 pm
Lopez’s motion. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 11:44 am
Maybe what we're saying is that you engaged in a "racist" act because it had such an effect. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:13 pm
If you take that view, then once you have analyzed the individual mandate under existing Commerce Clause doctrine, you’re basically done: There is no more added power under the Necessary and Proper Clause, as the Lopez test has already factored in that power. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
