Search for: "In re Means"
Results 601 - 620
of 89,586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2024, 11:39 am
In essence, it means that once you’re acquitted or convicted, that’s it — you cannot be brought back into court for the same offense. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:19 pm
The post US appeals court agrees to re-hear Hawaii butterfly knife ban case appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 3:14 am
While you’re at it, you can help spread the word by writing a review on iTunes. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
This would mean that in the view of the domestic courts, there is hierarchy. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:06 am
If a case has been relisted once, it generally means that the Court is paying close attention to the case, and the chances of a grant are higher than for an average case. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 10:36 pm
What it doesn’t mean US law enforcement can access your data anywhere in the world It doesn’t actually mean that the world’s servers are now fair game for the FBI. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:41 am
Or, to return to the real estate analogy, freedom of association means you’re free to move, but you shouldn’t be able to threaten an exodus to get the homeowners’ association to evict a neighbor.... [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
You’re injured and your car is a total loss. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:30 pm
In re Ferreira, 549 B.R. 232, 237 (Bankr. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:15 am
You’re told the company will be conducting an investigation, meaning a matter is being taken seriously. [read post]
22 May 2007, 6:07 am
from the diaries of the tennessee dude... prosecutors - and i do not know any personally - must have an interestingly ambiguous existence at the edge of the ethical universe...those who seek the death penalty in murder cases with "aggravating" circumstances - personally and at a minimum i find all murders aggravating - must at some point in their own lives seek and ask for... [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 11:02 pm
In the end, sharing that loan might mean the end of your relationship. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
You can view or download the case here: In re Mason. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 3:30 am
That is, there’s nothing wrong with subjecting folks who fail drug and alcohol tests to additional re-tests, even if that means that they’ll be tested more frequently than those not identified as former substance abusers. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Religious objection to vaccination: Re WSP (A Child)" in Law & Religion UK, 26 October 2023, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2023/10/26/religious-objection-to-vaccination-re-wsp-a-child/. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 12:07 pm
Some days when you're feeling like you want to bail on the whole public defender experience, maybe it isn't you, or your clients, or even your caseload - maybe it's your office culture.I also enjoyed these posts from Legal Sanity, on lawyer burnout, and on "meaning + money". [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 7:35 am
As we discussed in the last 2 posts on New York Court Watcher, the First Amendment's "no law" language does not really mean no law at all. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 10:55 am
In my earlier posting I reported that the Italian Parliament had, by means of a decree dated December 22, 2005, lifted all Official fees in 2006 for patents, utility models, and designs, including application fees and maintenance fees. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
While pileup accidents are devastating and often tragic events, this does not mean that they are either uncommon or unlikely to happen. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 12:24 pm
It’s also an excuse to get some new footwear if you’re in to that sort of thing. [read post]
