Search for: "In re R. S. (1985)" Results 601 - 620 of 1,235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A.The applicant filed a request for re-establishment on November 29, 2011.The EPO informed the applicant that this request was late-filed because the cause of non-compliance within the meaning of R 136(1) had been removed on September 20.The applicant argued that the paralegals of the private practice had asked Dr. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:45 pm by Courtney Minick
As I’ve written about before, it seems obvious that these things should be available free of charge and copyright restrictions – but they’re not. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm by Kirk Jenkins
., No. 113836 -- (1) Does the Federal Food Security Act of 1985, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”The present decision shows that Pascal’s observation also holds true in patent law.The Board had to decide on an appeal by the patent proprietors against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to maintain the opposed patent in amended form.One of the core questions before the Board was whether the claims were entitled to the priority.NB: All legal provisions refer to the EPC 1973.[6] The assessment of inventive step hinges on the question whether or not document D3… [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
Elliott, “References, Structural Argumentation and the Organizing Principles of Canada’s Constitution” (2000), 80 Canadian Bar Review 67, and decisions such as the, Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 721, [1985] S.C.J. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:01 am by Bill Marler
Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) today announced the re-chartering of the National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods (NACMCF) and welcomes the addition of new members. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
”6 Of particular note is Bluntschli’s discussion of the duration of author’s rights. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 1:54 pm by J
He held that, notwithstanding the failure to comply with s.47, 1987 Act, the demands were still a “demand for payment” within the meaning of s.20B, 1985 Act. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 1:54 pm by J
He held that, notwithstanding the failure to comply with s.47, 1987 Act, the demands were still a “demand for payment” within the meaning of s.20B, 1985 Act. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:40 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The farmhouse across the street had been occupied by a tenant since 1985, but the tenant had left four months earlier, and the house was vacant. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:22 am by Sheppard Mullin
Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614, 637 (1985)) regarding “effective vindication” of rights. [read post]