Search for: "James Hamilton"
Results 601 - 620
of 1,193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2016, 11:55 am
” The Federalist No. 84, supra at 444 (Alexander Hamilton). [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 1:01 am
Nevertheless, Washington was excoriated by other Founders like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, who thought Washington, Hamilton, and Adams expressed monarchist proclivities. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 10:46 am
The case was presented on June 29, 1784 with Chief Justice James Duane presiding. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
In reply to John Adams’s praise for the British constitution, which sought to purge the government of corruption, Alexander Hamilton outraged Jefferson and Madison by observing that its corruption was precisely what made the British government so perfect. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 11:49 am
Hamilton and the judge who adopted his view, James Kent, had become close friends in the years before the Croswell case. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:06 am
[Above the Law / 2016 Salary Increase] * A profile of James Hamilton of Morgan Lewis whom Hillary Clinton recruited to find her running mate. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 12:00 am
” Interested readers may also enjoy the LARB’s review of Hamilton and reflection on its characters--mainly the complex and contradictory Jefferson as well as the misrepresented General Lee--which “exist not to define but to provoke. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 1:09 am
James Madison You can read the text of the Twelfth Amendment here. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 6:30 am
Assigned readings in primary documents will illuminate his collaboration and quarrels with fellow founders, including James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Marshall; selected secondary sources will introduce participants to the legal and constitutional history of the Early American Republic. [read post]
29 May 2016, 12:00 am
This "very engaging book" is an “effort to dismantle the idea that the Founding Fathers, James Madison in particular, were radical anti-government activists and that the Constitution reflected that judgment. [read post]
26 May 2016, 10:47 am
Wythe, Hamilton and C. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:29 am
The Whigs who exiled President Tyler believed that they would be able to elect Henry Clay in 1844, but he was defeated by the Democrat James Polk, who ran with Tyler’s implicit support. [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:45 am
When a group of civil society representatives and academics gathered at the NSA this past Thursday, it became clear—to me at least—that the NSA has taken the teachings of James Madison very much to heart. [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:45 am
When a group of civil society representatives and academics gathered at the NSA this past Thursday, it became clear—to me at least—that the NSA has taken the teachings of James Madison very much to heart. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:30 am
Assigned readings in primary documents will illuminate his collaboration and quarrels with fellow founders, including James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Marshall; selected secondary sources will introduce participants to the legal and constitutional history of the Early American Republic. [read post]
4 May 2016, 4:30 am
Smith and James P. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 8:32 am
Just Read These Insider SEC Emails by Jesse Eisinger in Pro Publica James Kidney, a longtime SEC lawyer, was assigned to take the completed investigation and bring the case to trial. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:56 am
” Briefly: In Salon, Anna Arceneaux urges the Court to review the case of Bobby James Moore – who, she says, “has a lifelong intellectual disability, yet he sits on Texas’s death row because the courts there used John Steinbeck’s “Of Mice and Men” to decide his fate. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
I do want to acknowledge by name the six students or former students who have served as RegBlog’s editors in chief, for I have perhaps seen most closely the work that they have undertaken in shouldering the principal leadership of the organization: Jonathan Mincer, Sean Moloney, James Hobbs, Jessica Bassett, Alexandra Hamilton, and Kim Kirschenbaum. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:13 am
” Other commentary comes from Janai Nelson, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights characterizes the ruling as “at once extraordinary and entirely predictable,” and from James DeLong, who at American Thinker contends that the decision represents “an advance for the cause of constitutional conservatism, and for the future of the Republic. [read post]
