Search for: "John/Jane Doe " Results 601 - 620 of 1,047
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2013, 6:56 pm by APransky
Since John and Jane have common friends, one of these friends may tell Jane about the posting. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
  Table of Contents   Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
30 May 2013, 2:06 pm by Howard Knopf
If Voltage thinks is can sue thousands of John and Jane does in one singles lawsuit, it is likely going to be disappointed, given that each case could present different facts and different defences. [read post]
19 May 2013, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  For example, I love being able to quickly say "send a message to my wife that I am running 5 minutes late" or "remind me when I get to work to call John Doe" or "add milk to my grocery list" and have the iPhone instantly obey using the Messages and Reminders apps. [read post]
15 May 2013, 3:54 pm by Kenan Farrell
John Does 1-23 Court Case Number:    1:12-cv-00841-SEB-DKLFile Date:    Monday, June 18, 2012Plaintiff:     Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel:     Paul J. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm by Ron Coleman
 John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]
1 May 2013, 9:00 am by The Book Review Editor
  There are growing questions about the strategic success of the drone war (I quote Jane Harman and Stanley McChrystal, but could have cited many others). [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
‘, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly April 11, 2013 [Abstract] Digital Media Law Project, Berkman Center: We Have a New Name Professor Patrick Keyzer (lead author), Jane Johnston, Sharon Rodrick, Anne Wallace, Geoff Holland and Mark Pearson. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:10 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00672-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:09 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00671-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:08 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00670-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:06 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00668-JMS-MJDFile Date: Wednesday, April 24, 2013Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John DoeCause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:38 am by Laura Orr
You can find a list of the Oregon’s recent BitTorrent and Peer-to-Peer (download) cases, copies of complaints, and other information at the Oregon Intellectual Property Law’s February 26, 2013, post: List of Oregon Download Cases – 2013. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:28 am by Susan Brenner
It’s a matter of common sense and fairness.If hearsay weren’t excluded, John Doe could take the stand and say Jane Doe told him the defendant – Richard Roe – who’s on trial for murder confessed to the whole thing. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 10:31 am by Jeff Kosseff
  Defendant John Doe 1, who operated a website about the law school, sought a protective order and moved to quash the subpoena to his Internet service provider. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 4:58 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Speech #3 Jane Bambauer / Is Data Speech? [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  What does your analysis have to say about prior restraint? [read post]