Search for: "Lawrence Harding" Results 601 - 620 of 1,273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
[This defense of Zygna not impressing me, for it is hard to back the valuation of a company that is"selling" imaginary goods. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:48 am by SHG
It's not hard to picture. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:46 pm by Jayni Foley Hein
By contrast, there is no hard data cited in the notice of proposed rulemaking supporting the position that PACE projects may decrease home values. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 12:22 am
Also giving us the benefit of her thought is the 1709 Blog's Iona Harding (Baker & McKenzie). [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:31 pm by Nerds in Court
HG are also using e-books to bring every hard-to-find title to fans that might be looking for obscure titles with small printings. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:07 am by Staci Zaretsky
[New York Law Journal] * This is a really hard to believe newspaper headline: “Law firm recognizes employees have life outside of work. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm by Chris Castle
This is a lot of agina to go through because a petulant Lawrence Lessig was embarrassed by an easily predictable loss in the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Joe Kristan
  Take this hard-working Ohio attorney described by Cincinnati.com: Sparta attorney Meredith “Larry” Lawrence will be sentenced in October on federal tax evasion charges for failing to report income from various sources – including Racers Gentleman’s Club in Sparta. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 11:44 am by Frank Pasquale
“And yet, it seems awfully hard for people to find a job. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 6:22 am by Frank Pasquale
“And yet, it seems awfully hard for people to find a job. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:52 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hardwick in 1986, upholding a Georgia law that made it a crime for adult gay couples to engage in homosexual acts in private, a decision that was overruled in 2003 by Lawrence v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
”1 Aside from the granular problems stated above, and recognizing that the proposed amendments would in fact add to the problem astutely noted in the quote above by Lawrence Lessig, there is a global, more systemic conflict at issue within the realm of copyright enforcement litigation deserving mention. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:44 am by Schachtman
IMPUTATION As I noted in part one, the tables were turned on imputation, with plaintiffs making the same accusation that G.E. made in the gadolinium litigation:  imputation involves adding “phantom events” or “imaginary events to each arm of ‘zero event’ trials. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Modernisation without resources and without this ethos could produce a mechanistic, crude process which reduces the chances for children of remaining with their parents or wider family in a rush to adoption – in parenting terms a cold, hard, authoritarian model. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:34 pm by Duncan Hollis
Or, a treaty could facilitate/require the use of cyber operations before States can turn to kinetic weaponry; the very thing Lawrence Muir suggests a treaty would preclude. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Washington is just as protective of the First Amendment as every other state (Citizen Media Law sums up Washington’s laws), and so defamation is generally quite hard to prove, requiring proof of “(1) falsity, (2) an unprivileged communication, (3) fault, and (4) damages. [read post]