Search for: "Little v. King" Results 601 - 620 of 1,363
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by Donna Ballman
Since there's lots of dancing at weddings, and there are lots of same-sex weddings going on nationwide, this is a fine day to read Heather Bussing's Religion v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Several early Czech kings maintained their royal seat in the fortress, which, other than a few restored sections, is largely in ruins. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:01 am by Andy
We know from caselaw, for example Lucasfilm, Interlegoand the much earlier 'Popeye' case (King Features Syndicate Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm by Kevin
In last week's opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:37 am by Joy Waltemath
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, and joined by Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, found that the ACA phrase “an Exchange established by the state” did not expressly limit tax credits to state Exchanges, as alleged by the petitioners, but was properly viewed as ambiguous and that several other provisions in the ACA would make little sense if tax credits were not available to federal Exchange enrollees (King v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:02 am by Kit Case
Plus: 20 stats about Obamacare Republicans don’t want you to see Asked what he might get out of King v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 8:39 am by Gregory Forman
” Both events help make this country a little more perfect union. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:25 pm by Einer Elhauge
Einer Elhauge is the Petrie Professor of Law at Harvard Law School My major takeaways from the Supreme Court’s opinion in King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:09 am by Bart Torvik
Fan(s)™ of my Platinum Coin series surely knew where I stood on the latest challenge to Obamacare, King v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:36 am
With only three decision days still scheduled for this Supreme Court Term (Thursday, Friday, and Monday), the waiting for the Court’s decision in King v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the possibility that the Court “tipped its hand” in King v. [read post]