Search for: "Locke v. State"
Results 601 - 620
of 3,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am
Introduction In 1998, Bill Clinton signed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), a sweeping overhaul of U.S. copyright law notionally designed to update the system for the digital era. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm
On Aug. 14, a 2-1 panel of the Ninth Circuit ruled California's confiscation unconstitutional, in Duncan v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:10 am
Mesa and Ziglar v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 5:02 am
See, e.g., Scott v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 10:49 am
Hindel v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
Finding it difficult to keep up with an ever-changing world in the midst of a health, environmental, social and political crisis, while keeping up with patent law? [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 8:08 pm
State, and Hurst v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 5:05 pm
” PPF Safeguard, LLC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 7:56 am
It would effectively “go around” encryption by allowing the interdiction of malicious materials in an unencrypted state, even in the absence of predication for law enforcement intervention. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 6:23 am
Apple and Epic Games v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:17 am
See Barnes v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 3:07 am
“The mere failure to hold shareholders’ meetings in and of itself, does not constitute sufficient grounds to bring about dissolution under [BCL § 1104 (c)]” (Nelkin v H.J.R. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 4:49 pm
"] See Hay v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:06 am
This case presents the rare victory for the inmate.The case is Elder v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
[After two days of hero worship for Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Gorsuch, day three dumps on the Junior Justice.] [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:24 pm
Our real-life case for today is Bradwell v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
" Roberts separately referred to exemptions from state anti-bias laws for religious employers, and in their private discussions, CNN has learned, justices mulled religious liberty concerns. [read post]
