Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers" Results 601 - 620 of 21,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 9:31 am by John Elwood
First, because that was the strongest claim as a matter of doctrine. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 2:32 pm by Neomi Rao (guest-blogging)
For instance, it does not matter that Congress ostensibly “gives away” power when delegating. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
Ashok Hurra, (2002) 4 SCC 388 had specified requirements to entertain curative petitions under its inherent power so that floodgates are not opened for filing a second review petition as a matter of course in the guise of a curative petition under inherent power.[4]The first instance of the application of Rupa Ashok Hurra is to be found in State of Madhya Pradesh v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:03 am by MBettman
(D) The arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:53 am
The same could have been said of recent decisions at first instance on the corporate veil (particularly Ben Hashem v Shayif), until two magisterial judgments of the Court of Appeal this year: VTB Capital v Nutritek and, last week, Petrodel v Michael Prest. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am by J
The power to vary an ASBO includes a power to extend its duration - Leeds City Council v RG [2007] EWHC 1612; [2007] 1 WLR 3025. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am by J
The power to vary an ASBO includes a power to extend its duration - Leeds City Council v RG [2007] EWHC 1612; [2007] 1 WLR 3025. [read post]