Search for: "Maine v. Superior Court" Results 601 - 620 of 1,006
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by Haim Abraham
The path taken by the courts in awarding massive punitive damages against foreign states is a dangerous one for two main reasons. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:06 am by Jani Ihalainen
The US District Court did look at non-human authorship some time ago in Naruto v Slater (discussed more here and here), and maintained that non-humans cannot have authorship in works, which has been established some time in the US judiciary (specifically referring to 'humans' or 'persons'). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
   From this general study, it is then possible to begin to focus more particularly on the interpretation and application of law, focusing on the role of the courts and their frameworks for statutory and constitutional interpretation. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Superior Court (2018) 4 Cal.5th 607, 632 [discussing 2000 article on deterrence effects of reporting potentially violent patients], People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
"[11] "The Court is a public institution and the public has a right to look over our shoulders and see who is seeking relief in public court. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
In R v McKenzie, a 2015 case from the Ontario Superior Court, Campbell J crafted a procedure for determining whether the prosecution had edited too much information from an ITO. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:01 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Bre-Ex Ltd., the Ontario Superior Court recently held that by adopting arbitral rules which preclude an appeal, the parties thereby opt out of statutory appeal rights. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 8:00 pm by Kyla Stott-Jess
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice upheld the decision on appeal, see Baroch v Canada Cartage. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Susan Collins (Maine), two Republican women who support abortion rights. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
The points are granted to managers that: (i) notice a problem; (ii) react to the problem by notifying their superior; and (iii) suggest solutions, and perhaps try to implement them. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by Bruce Nye
Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company (1983) 34 Cal.3d 49, described by one of Uncle CBL's favorite Superior Court judges as "one of the stupidest decisions ever to come out of the Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 8:08 pm
  On September 12, 2008, Integrity shareholders filed a purported class action in Georgia (Fulton County) Superior Court against the holding company and four Integrity officers. [read post]