Search for: "Matter of Hodge" Results 601 - 620 of 823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 7:15 am by Joy Waltemath
While Windsor held that Congress’ power to define marriage was limited, the federal circuits are currently split regarding whether principles of individual rights or of federalism ground the Windsor opinion, and this very question is currently pending before the Supreme Court in Obergefell v Hodges (Dkt No 14-556). [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:40 pm by Holland & Hart
Hodges case, which will be decided before July. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am by DOUGLAS MCGREGOR, BRODIES LLP
In these circumstances Lord Reed accepted that the Supreme Court should approach the matter in the same way as any other court of appeal. [read post]
However, both Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge are extremely kind and the discussions are so engaging that I soon forgot my nerves. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:31 pm by Bradley Coxe
Disobeying traffic laws that have been enacted for public safety is negligence per se, or negligence as a matter of law. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:31 pm by Bradley Coxe
Disobeying traffic laws that have been enacted for public safety is negligence per se, or negligence as a matter of law. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:01 am by Lauren Wood, Olswang LLP
Appeal to Supreme Court The lessees brought an appeal to the Supreme Court which was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, and Lord Hodge on 26 January 2015. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 8:25 am by INFORRM
  The editors’ decision on all matters relating to the quiz is, as usual, final. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
Hodges, 14-556 (Ohio), Tanco v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
” Lady Hale’s characterisation of the matter before the Court placed the issue firmly on the ground of statutory construction. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  The editors’ decision on all matters relating to the quiz is, as usual, final. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
Hodges 14-556Issue: (1) Whether Ohio’s constitutional and statutory bans on recognition of marriages of same-sex couples validly entered in other jurisdictions violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 2:15 am by Carol Wilkinson
The leading judgment was given by Lord Hodge, and it addressed the following five points: S 75(1) provides that a debtor shall have a “like claim” against the creditor who along with the creditor shall be jointly and severally liable to the debtor. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:18 am by Samuel Sherwood, Olswang LLP
Paragon subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court, which heard the matter on 11 and 12 June 2014. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
The lead judgment was given by Lord Neuberger (with which Lord Sumption, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge agreed). [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 6:03 am by Stephanie Woods, Olswang LLP
As a matter of construction, the 1976 Act does not have extra-territorial effect. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
Naturally, I am pleased that this matter is now resolved but maintain that such an article should never have been published in the first place. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:16 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
The appeal was heard on Monday 3 and Tuesday 4 November 2014 by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hodge. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm by Schachtman
” Reaching back even further into the judiciary’s wrestling with the issue of the difference between legal and scientific standards of proof, we have one of the clearest and clearly incorrect statements of the matter[13]: “Petitioners demand sole reliance on scientific facts, on evidence that reputable scientific techniques certify as certain. [read post]