Search for: "Michaels Stores, Inc."
Results 601 - 620
of 845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 2:59 am
The best place to start is with Michael Moss's December 30, 2009 investigative report in the New York Times on the ammonia process used by Beef Products, Inc to make LFTB (lean finely textured beef).The article contains the first mention of the term "pink slime" as a pejorative for this product.Moss provides confidential documents detailing the effects of the ammonia processing of LFTB, and revelations of the discrepancy between USDA's standards for beef safety… [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 11:10 am
., Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 12:52 am
The teen and her mother allege that Florida-based Haronmar Inc. negligently trained and supervised store manager Hector Figueroa, who faces felony charges of lewd and lascivious battery. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:00 am
., Inc. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:27 am
See Michael Moss, "E. coli Path Shows Flaws in Beef Inspection," New York Times, at A 1. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:18 am
He made several low blows and comments about i4i's lawyer and Michael Vulpe. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 11:59 pm
Pezzano and Michael P. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 12:56 am
ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us
© 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:07 am
Not according to Good Old Games founders and Three Rings CEO (Techdirt) Government admits data mining for terrorists doesn't work (Techdirt) Delayed enforcement blocks domain name lawsuit: Southern Grouts v 3M (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Judge dismisses plaintiff's declaratory judgment claim regarding lawfulness of kooks.com based on lack of controversy: Global DNS v Kooks Custom Headers (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Judge orders new trial, implores Congress to… [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 2:30 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 7:56 am
In City of Euclid, Ohio and FOP, Ohio Labor Council, Inc., Arbitrator Gregory Szuter upheld two of three grievance filed on behalf Euclid police officer Michael Amiott. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
The staff of the SEC’s Division of corporation finance stated that Amazon.com, Inc., may not exclude a pair of shareholder proposals on facial recognition technology from its proxy materials. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
Amazon.com, for example, grew into a huge online bookstore, then music store, then store for all kinds of goods because it had open, free access to the technical standards on which the web operates. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:22 pm
Garrett Boone, co-founder, Container Store Nothing is more common than a good idea. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Afro-IP) Australia Major changes to Patents Act proposed; proposed changes anger Australian patent attorneys (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) (Managing Intellectual Property) IP examination centre in Melbourne to boost Australian innovation and jobs (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court: ‘Use it or lose it’ approach confirmed: E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Bulgaria M-Tel ‘best Bulgarian brand’ in independent… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Afro-IP) Europe Advocate General opines advertisement comparing perfume to L’Oreal’s did not infringe trade marks; translation issue: L’Oréal v Bellure (Out-Law) (IPKat) (Class 46) (IPKat) (Class 46) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) Advocate General opines in Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening concerning the storing and printing of small amounts of text extract from newspapers (IPKat), (IPKat) European… [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:45 pm
., Inc. (15-RC-8615; 349 NLRB No. 96) Gulfport and Escatawpa, MS May 4, 2007. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and sale of… [read post]
