Search for: "Oral Folks"
Results 601 - 620
of 821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2010, 11:08 am
I had taken a graduate seminar in oral history without ever hearing of institutional review boards. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:37 am
Monday, the Court of Review heard oral argument from Chuck Babcock representing Keller and from Mike McKetta representing the Special Commission on Judicial Conduct - you know, the folks who warned us about Keller and Keller about . . . us? [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:01 am
Judge O'Connell wrote separately because he would have more narrowly tailored the affirmative defenses available in the MMA, and because he wished to "elaborate" on some of the general discussion of the Act set forth in the briefs and at oral argument.Elaborate he did. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 4:55 am
Take note, however, that at least one appellate jurist would have folks managing chronic "pain" with prescription meds until the medical marijuana mess is sorted out by our Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
September 13, 2010, Volume 2, Number 26 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:42 am
But when the jurist in question has appeared in pornography that made its way on to the interwebs, we make an exception.There are some updates in the tale of Madam Justice Lori Douglas, the Canadian judge who appeared in nude photos showing Her Honor engaging in bondage, playing with sex toys and performing oral sex. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
A professional colleague of mine named Grant Moher recently spent a considerable amount of time examining the interplay between the prohibition of adultery in the Commonwealth of Virginia and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 4:27 am
But the speaking tics are a matter of particular concern since these are the folks molding mushy minds to become brilliant and persuasive oral advocates. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 2:44 pm
” (although folks seem to throw in “right? [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:28 pm
Social History focuses on “social groups rather than on individuals, on the masses rather than the elites, and on ordinary folk rather than prominent people. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
Has this term, he asks, suddenly grown a meaning which is generally understood and which is now in common use among branding folk? [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:23 am
ScotusBlog reports on the Court's calendar for oral arguments for the opening session of the coming Term. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:34 am
By asking these folk, “why are you here? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:55 am
Thanks again to the folks at Prawfs for allowing me to loiter long enough to post about today's opinion in Bilski v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 9:23 am
Directions encourage folks to share what they think the best combinations of toppings are, and World’s Best may create some offer some special pies using those suggestions. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 1:08 pm
I use it in reference to the regular folks who just live a regular life and assume its always going to be that way. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:02 am
Post-Barnes, Craigslist probably no longer tells folks that it will "take care of it" or promise any remediation of any sort. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:35 pm
All right, folks. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:43 am
I don't know about you, but I often begin my oral arguments with those immortal words from Speed.It kinda throws the judge for a loop and signals to opposing counsel that you're ready to blow something up -- in other words, a nice icebreaker.So how was your weekend? [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:10 pm
Referring to the UK government as ‘generally recognised by the media as an enemy of free speech’, the submission on behalf of the eight organisations explains that it is ‘obviously unsatisfactory to have the main case against a new and unique restriction on the media argued by a party in which the media and civil society itself has no confidence, in written submissions that have not been shown to the media for comment and in oral submissions to which the media cannot… [read post]
