Search for: "PEOPLE v. GEORGE" Results 601 - 620 of 3,136
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2021, 7:48 am by Rachel E. VanLandingham
The Supreme Court in its famous 1969 Brandenburg v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Lash starts his compilation with the greatest hits of any conventional founding-era edited volume:   the Declaration of Independence, the Federalist, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:15 am by Kevin
Well, yes, Alec Guinness, but I would also accept “Judge Kenneth Lee of the Ninth Circuit,” whose opinion in Briseño v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:41 am by SHG
They were debating whether much of the Supreme Court case of Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:59 pm by Josh Blackman
Ferguson, which held that segregation did not imply Black people's inferiority, and instead only mentioned its ideas in discussing Brown v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:32 pm by Nathan Sheard
Like many of you, the anniversary of George Floyd's murder has inspired us to reflect on these commitments and the work of so many courageous people who stood up to demand justice. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 12:59 pm by David Cole
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Koala v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 11:00 am by Jameel Jaffer
(Notably, another signatory to the same brief is Don Verrilli, who served as Solicitor General under President Barack Obama and in that capacity represented the government in Amnesty v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
The two principal “institutional” powers people typically cite are, first, Congress’s inherent contempt authority—which, a century ago, it used occasionally to imprison recalcitrant witnesses—and, second, Congress’s authority to appropriate money. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am by Mark C. Niles
That all changed in 1961 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Monroe v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 11:39 am by Benjamin Herbst
  One year later the State’s highest court again clarified the bounds of decriminalization by ruling in State v. [read post]